History, 08.10.2019 13:30 lilswetheart2007
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?
a. to hear about the event from someone who was directly involved
b. to learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event
c. to see the event through the eyes of someone who witnessed it
d. to understand how people felt during the period when the event happened
Answers: 3
Other questions on the subject: History
History, 22.06.2019 03:00, marykayy0218own5cp
Why did reagan have the united stars invade grenada
Answers: 2
History, 22.06.2019 07:30, markjiron2880
Explain the importance of carnegie, morgan, and rockefeller on the american political scene of the early 1900's.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historica...
Questions in other subjects:
Chemistry, 21.12.2020 01:00
Social Studies, 21.12.2020 01:00
Mathematics, 21.12.2020 01:00
