Historian a says widespread famine in china caused the boxer rebellion. historian b responds with supporting evidence that the boxer rebellion was a reaction to european colonial power in china.
how would you describe the action of historian b?
a. offered a point of view
b. made a counterclaim
c. gave a claim
d. showed bias

B. Made a counterclaim

Explanation:

It is an argument that consists of showing through a counterargument that the thesis defended by our opponent is wrong or false. You can understand, then, that refuting your opponent's thesis in the debate is something similar to what happens when we drop a building that was standing because it can not be sustained: a demolition process. With this you may not have yet been able to prove that your thesis is better, stronger or true. But, at least, you have shown the weakness of your opponent's argument.

based on this information, i would advocate against sweatshop labour because it exploits workers in unsafe working conditions with little pay. though sweatshops produce inexpensive goods, they harm the environment, workers, and often use unsafe materials to make consumer goods.

the soviet union wanted to impose communist governments in eastern europe.