As a result of the supreme court ruling in the dred scott case, slaveholders had the legal right to take enslaved persons into?

a. missouri.
b. any territory.
c. kansas and nebraska.
d. western territories.

The correct answer is B) any territory.

The Dred Scott case is one of the most famous Supreme Court cases in US history. In this case, Dred Scott his suing for his freedom. Even though Scott was a slave, his master brought him to live in the Illinois territory (which outlawed slavery). Scott argued that living in a free territory made him a free man.

However, the Supreme Court ruled against him. Chief Justice Roger Taney stated that slaves are property, not people. Therefore, they had no "legal rights which white men are bound to respect." This ruling was critical, as it essentially made slavery legal everywhere. This is because slave owners can bring their slaves wherever they want without having to worry about them becoming free.

it is relaxation hope this

when we think of a­ncient paga­n kings, the ideas of justice and fairness probably aren't the first things to come to mind. we moderns may be more likely to imagine fickle, power-hungry despots who were ready to put someone to death on a whim. but king hammurabi, who ruled a prosperous and thriving babyloniaalmost four millennia ago, doesn't quite fit that mold. he claimed to have protect the weak from oppression, and scholars believe he fostered an atmosphere of justice and righteousness for his people.

this belief is based on an object that was discovered only a century ago. it has already earned a place alongside the rosetta stone as one of the most important artifacts of the ancient world. this stela (stone pillar) bears the inscription of the code of hammurabi, and it has shed light on the laws, culture and life in babylonia.

read more on -