Do you think that irredentism is more valid than imperialism?

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

I think irredentism is more valid than imperialism because irredentism is the valid claim of people or nations to a lost territory conquered in the past by imperialistic ideas.

Imperialism is the idea powerful nations have to conquer and expand territories. Once these territories were conquered, the land is split according to political and economic interests. That is when irredentism, comes into place. People have the legit demand to claim their lands back because they originally belonged to them.

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n:

can i know the options so i can answer the qu