Look closely at the painting of jesus of nazareth. does this painting represent artistic themes and techniques developed during the renaissance?

   It does not represent artistic themes and a technique developed during the Renaissance, but during the Medieval Church Iconography

Explanation:  This picture of Jesus of Nazareth has its own name and it is an icon that depicts Christ's Transfiguration. In the picture, beside to Christ, Moses and the prophet Elijah from the Old Testament are shown, who appear to him during his transformation. Below are three Christ's Apostles who watched His Transfiguration in a miracle. This is a typical picture of early Christianity, and as such is a masterpiece of Church art. This technique of painting was used by the Middle Ages, which is characteristic of medieval iconography.

So since this is a medieval icon, it is certainly not a work of Renaissance art. The artistic techniques of painting developed during the Renaissance are completely different, the perspective is emphasized, also light and nature, while humanism dominate as a motive. Renaissance techniques have achieved a perspective, i.e. a sense of three dimensions.

This depiction of the image of Jesus of Nazareth is painted completely by different techniques, natural colors used made of plants, the religious motive is emphasized, no perspective because the purpose of this painting is completely different, which does not mean that there is no value.

sure but add mine: melku504

explanation:

i'm in keystone 8th grade btw

the exact role and status of women in the roman world, and indeed in most ancient societies, has often been obscured by the biases of both ancient male writers and 19-20th century ce male scholars, a situation only relatively recently redressed by modern scholarship which has sought to more objectively assess women's status, rights, duties, representation in the arts, and daily lives; and all this from almost exclusively male source material dealing with a male-dominated roman world.

women in mythology

unlike some other ancient cultures such as the greeks who had formed a creation myth where woman was a creature secondary to man and, more specifically, in the form of pandora, a bringer of unhappiness and vices, the romans had a more neutral approach where humanity, and not specifically the male, was created by the gods from earth and water. ovid's metamorphoses, for example, does not specify whether the first human was a man or a woman. at least in a physical sense then men and women were not regarded as belonging to a different species as in the greek world, a view often reiterated in roman medical treatises.