Astrict constructionist would interpret the constitution

a) with consideration to the change in times
b) with consideration to the religious freedoms of people
c) exactly as it was written in the text
d) specifically with attention to connotations

The correct answer is C. A strict constructionist would interpret the Constitution exactly as it was written in the text.

Strict constructionism refers to a particular way of interpreting the Constitution and the laws of the United States. When used in a legal environment, it means that a judge must interpret the text as written, and not draw any consequence from it. Sometimes it is confused with "originalism," strict constructionism concentrates more on the text and less on the times when it was written. Its opposite, the broad interpretation of the Constitution, infers Congress powers or individual rights that are not expressly recognized in it. Sometimes called judicial activism, this was denounced by the opposition as an attempt by the activist courts to create legislation from the bench, usurping the legislative power.

my friend is on my computer

about 3,040,000 results (1.57 seconds)

explanation:

"o" (and any subsequent words) was ignored because we limit queries to 32 words.