subject
History, 07.10.2019 04:30 gunnatvinson

In katz v. united states, the supreme court ruled on whether police could tap a public phone without a warrant. identify one way in which the case is legally significant.

a. it determined the legal status of phone booths.
b. it established the idea of a reasonable expectation of privacy.
c. it led to new laws on who could issue warrants.
d. it increased the power of the supreme court.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 17:30, DianaAmaroxoxo4319
How does an oligarchy conflict with democratic principles
Answers: 2
image
History, 21.06.2019 20:30, kiingbr335yoqzaxs
Why didn’t the united states participate in the league of nations? the u. s. senate did not want the country to join. president wilson did not want the country to join. the league of nations was only for european countries. the league of nations had failed to prevent world war 1
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 05:30, kaliyab191
Match the description to the term. 1. ancient people of the british isles normans 2. possible location of oldest known writing emigrate 3. a variety of a language celts 4. the study of word forms indus valley 5. to leave one's country morphology 6. invaded england in a. d. 1066 dialect
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 08:00, OlamideO3
In the space provided, analyze the pros and cons of establishing smaller ethnic communities within larger communities like chinatown and little italy. use evidence to support your reasoning.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In katz v. united states, the supreme court ruled on whether police could tap a public phone without...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 30.07.2021 01:00