Consider the following scenario. you are on trial for assault. during your trial, witnesses testify that you were nowhere near the scene of the crime on the night the assault occurred. the jury hears this, finds you not guilty, and acquits you of the crime. a month later, the prosecutor finds new evidence that she believes links you to the crime. even though you have been found not guilty, what right can you invoke to protect you from being tried for the same crime again?
a.
the tenth amendment
b.
the third amendment
c.
the fifth amendment
d.
the first amendment

Read the excerpt from david foster wallace’s infinite jest. i have committed to crossing my legs i hope carefully, ankle on knee, hands together in the lap of my slacks. my fingers are mated into a mirrored series of what manifests, to me, as the letter x. the interview room’s other personnel include: the university’s director of composition, its varsity tennis coach, and academy prorector mr. a. delint. c. t. is beside me; the others sit, stand and stand, respectively, at the periphery of my focus. the tennis coach jingles pocket-change. based on this excerpt, which detail is implicit? a.  more chairs are needed to make seating available for all attendees. b.  hal is sitting in a chair with his ankle on his knee. c.  the director of composition is involved in the interview process. d.  the tennis coach has money in his front pocket.