History, 03.02.2020 01:51 selfiegymnast
"the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." which of the following possible court cases could be argued under the terms of the quote above? (4 points) a person sues the state for building an armory on nearby property a person refuses to serve the military when called up through a draft a person shoots and kills someone who broke into the family's home a person rejects police requests to unlock the car doors and windows
Answers: 3
Other questions on the subject: History
History, 22.06.2019 02:40, wy107
Washington said that the united states would be "friendly and impartial" in regard to foreign conflict. what was his reason behind this statement? a jefferson and washington had determined the u. s. was too weak to wage war. b the u. s. had a treaty with both england and france, and was thus required to remain neutral. c france asked for the united states to stay out of the war, due to trade relationships. d a special envoy from england asked for strict neutrality on behalf of the united states.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
"the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreaso...
Questions in other subjects:
Physics, 31.01.2021 14:50
