In a civil case, why would the plaintiff and defendant try to reach a settlement prior to the trial?
a) to avoid going to jail
eliminate
b) to avoid a guilty verdict
c) jury trials are not allowed in civil cases
d) trials can be expensive and time consuming

The correct answer is D. In a civil case, the plaintiff and defendant would try to reach a settlement prior to the trial because trials can be expensive and time consuming.

Explanation:

Usually, pre-judicial settlements are the preferred way for lawyers, defendants and plaintiffs to resolve civil law conflicts.

This is so because, if an agreement is not reached and a trial is initiated before the judiciary, the costs to move forward with the process are much greater, the time for debate is very long, and the time of collection of the winner can be delayed if there are appeals or other contingencies.

On the other hand, extrajudicial arrangements do not require costs more than those expenses incurred in the negotiation, and it is a much faster method, since the contact between the parties is direct and not in court.

b. major john c. frémont led a rebellion called the bear flag revolt.

explanation:

during the bear flag revolt, from june to july 1846, a small group of american settlers in california rebelled against the mexican government and proclaimed california an independent republic. the republic was short-lived because soon after the bear flag was raised, the u.s. military began occupying california, which went on to join the union in 1850. the bear flag became the official state flag in 1911.