History, 19.10.2019 02:00 taten1701

Do you think the bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki was an acceptable retaliation for the bombing of pearl harbor and the continued japanese damage to american troops? explain your answer.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

Yes, I do for two reasons. One, the attack on Pearl Harbor was unexpected and innocent lives were lost. Over 2,400 died. America wasn't even involved in a war and we were still bombed. Next, the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki weren't 100% about "revenge." Hiroshima and Nagasaki were military capitals. They produced most of the machines and weapons used in the war. By bombing there, you could cause a sharp decrease in weapons and Japan had no choices than to withdraw. This was better than fighting even more and even more lives lost.

Good luck :)

Answer from: maggie123456751

I completely disagree with the last answer. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a low blow by the U.S, the war was almost over and it was our way to officially end it. The bomb obliterated millions of people, and Japan is still suffering from the effects of it (radiation poisoning, birth defects, cancer) it also created tension between the u.s government and american citizens who believed we were wrong to bomb the japanese

Answer from: Quest

answer; william penn's approach made the colony diverse by attracting many types of people and religions;

Answer from: Quest

hi friend look late me tall you with my experience first politic because this subject it is more politic than be religious and also give you my experience in islam

first the islam it is not religion order to kill for we be clear .

so bin laden he not was man of religion for he use they taught sound islamic theology.

osama bin laden he was influenced by mullah mohammad omar, a very radical manosama bin laden's little understanding of religion has made osama bin laden's speech radical and deviated from the teachings of islam

so the answer > they used radical persuasive rhetoric

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 15:00, swagbruh6790

How did thomas paine's pamphlet common sense convince reluctant americans to abandon the goal of reconciliation with britain and accept that separation from britain — independence — was the only option for preserving their liberty?

Answers: 3

continue

History, 21.06.2019 16:00, crobinson2327

Why do we observe black history minth?

Answers: 1

continue

History, 21.06.2019 21:30, nany1982

Which fact would this be, and how might you verify the truth?

Answers: 3

continue

History, 21.06.2019 23:30, elf55

Wich part of the declaration of independence acts as an implied plan of action in that it lists laws and practices to be changed