Grant was considered a successful leader because
he ignored his past battles. he was promoted quickly. he wanted to learn from his mistakes. he knew how to run his family’s store

Grant was as an unobtrusive person full of tact, not a pronounced ego, calm, determined, observer. In the beginning there were dozens of officers more eloquent and more famous than him, but he managed to break through. One of the contemporaries once described him as a calm core of the cyclone. He was not known for his vices, decent, incomprehensible, well received criticism, willingly accepted guilt. All these characteristic features indicate that he was learning from his mistakes.

answer: both considered peasants valued members of society.

explanation: the ancient chinese and indian empires were large asian empires that had the same problems with other big empires, they had to work hard and sometimes fight in order to keep them united, they both relied heavily on their capacity to trade and to send strange and rare items to europe, and had the father as the head of the house hold in both societies, but they didn´t considered pleasants as valued members of their society, they were the bottom of the social pyramid in both of their societies.