subject
History, 02.02.2020 21:04 Jordandenzel

After signing the judiciary act of 1801, what did president adams attempt to do with his “midnight appointees”? a. control the size of jefferson's future cabinet b. determine the outcome of every u. s. court case in advance c. make the judicial branch more powerful than the legislative or executive branches d. ensure that at least one branch of government was under federalist control

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 19:30, zoeycrew
In the decision for dred scott vs. sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 01:30, lexipooh7894
How would high tariffs hurt america? a. fewer immigrants would be able to move to america b. sales of american products to other countries would go down c. americans would sell more goods to other countries d. goods imported from other countries would cost less
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 03:00, angela563
What characteristics did the kiowa share with the other plains people? a) they migrated from the same places b) they were nomadic hunters c) they used the horse extensively d) they spoke the common language! and you
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 08:00, aphillips2004
Why did alexander give the soldier who saved the hat band a reward? why did he then order the man's head cut off?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
After signing the judiciary act of 1801, what did president adams attempt to do with his “midnight a...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 12.12.2020 16:40
Konu
Social Studies, 12.12.2020 16:40