By the 1700s, what about slavery had changed?
enslaved people could be emancipated.
all enslaved people were of african descent.
enslaved people were considered employees.
all enslaved people were separated from family.

The answer is option B

Explanation:

Servitude alludes to a condition in which people are claimed by others, who control where they live and at what they work. Subjection had beforehand existed from the beginning of time, in commonly and generally puts. The antiquated Greeks, the Romans, Incas and Aztecs all had slaves.A slave is a man possessed by somebody and subjection is the condition of being under the control of somebody where a man is compelled to work for another. A slave is considered as a property of another as the one controlling them buys them or claims them from their birth.About 50 percent of the slaves were taken as detainees amid the continuous inborn wars happening among the West African kingdoms. Another 30 percent moved toward becoming slaves as discipline for violations or obligation. The rest of abducted by dark slave brokers.

im pretty sure it has something to do with the end of ww1

b) a state law could be declared illegal if it contradicted the constitution.

explanation:

the conflict of this case originated when james w. mcculloch, a cashier of the baltimore branch of the second bank of the united states that the congress had chartered in 1816, refused to pay a tax imposed by the maryland state.

in the case, the state of maryland appealed that the establishment of a second bank was unconstitutional since the constitution didn't say anything about granting that power to congress. however, the case determined that even if such right wasn't specifically stated in the constitution, it was part of the "implied powers" of the government enunciated in article i, section 8.

the case also eliminated maryland's legislation to impose taxes to a national bank, asserting that even though the states retained the power of taxation, the constitution's laws are supreme and can not be controlled by the states, therefore, if a state law contradicts the constitution, it should be declared illegal.

explanation: