subject
History, 27.01.2020 20:31 Misspaige5150

Read the excerpt from the state constitution of arkansas, which was adopted in 1874.

no person who may hereafter fight a duel, assist in the same as second, or send, accept, or knowingly carry a challenge therefor, shall hold any office in the state, for a period of ten
-arkansas state constitution, article 19, section

how would a rule like this most likely be interpreted by someone interested in state constitutional reform?
a. this rule would be seen as a fundamental law of lasting importance that should not be changed.
b. this rule would be seen as a statutory law that the state legislature should pass but not put in the constitution.
c. this rule would be seen as a miscellaneous provision that no longer has any practical effect and does not need to be in the constitution.
d. this rule would be seen as a preamble that has no legal force and could remain in the document to explain the constitution's purpose.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 14:30, andii1101
What was the primary concern for the missouri statehood question
Answers: 2
image
History, 21.06.2019 23:30, 2002boo13
What was the job of the second continental congress
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 23:30, Ary10113
How do you think american life would change greatly, as soldiers went to war in europe?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 00:00, kfull7053
How did geography influence the development of the byzantine empire?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Read the excerpt from the state constitution of arkansas, which was adopted in 1874.

no...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
History, 07.09.2019 00:10
Konu
Mathematics, 07.09.2019 00:10