Which answer best explains the cherokee's main argument against georgia in cherokee nation v. georgia? (5 points)
the cherokee argued they had legally bought their land from other tribes.
the cherokee argued they were a separate nation and not bound by state laws.
the cherokee argued they had already signed an agreement with the federal government.
the cherokee argued they had given all their land to the missions so georgia had no case. description

The Cherokee argued they were a separate nation and not bound by state laws.

Explanation:

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, it was a case of the Supreme Court of the United States. The Cherokee Nation applied for a federal court order against the laws passed by the State of Georgia of the United States. UU That deprived them of rights within their limits, but the Supreme Court did not hear the case on its merits. It was ruled that he had no original jurisdiction in the matter, since the Cherokees were a dependent nation, with a relationship to the United States as that of a "ward to his guardian," as Judge Marshall said.

the berlin blockade was an international crisis that arose from an attempt by the soviet union, in 1948–49, to force the western allied powers (the united states, the united kingdom, and france) to abandon their post-world war ii jurisdictions in west berlin. in march 1948 the allied powers decided to unite their different occupation zones of germany into a single economic unit. in protest, the soviet representative withdrew from the allied control council. coincident with the introduction of a new deutsche mark in west berlin (as throughout west germany), which the soviets regarded as a violation of agreements with the allies, the soviet occupation forces in eastern germany began a blockade of all rail, road, and water communications between berlin and the west. on june 24 the soviets announced that the four-power administration of berlin had ceased and that the allies no longer had any rights there.

cur

explanation:

cancer