How were the economic effects of england's constitutional monarchy different from those of the absolute monarchies of spain and france?
a. the monarchs of spain and france were enormously wealthy, while those of england were on a par with the nobles.
b. england was able to extract more wealth from its new world colonies than spain and france did from theirs.
c. england's economy grew more, since it relied on private merchants and companies rather than on royal management.
d. france and spain developed a sizable middle class, while england was strictly divided into rich and poor.

The correct answer is C. England's economy grew more, since it relied on private merchants and companies rather than on royal management.

Explanation:

i really really really really really really dont know

pizarro staged a mock trial and found atahualpa guilty of revolting against the spanish, practicing idolatry, and murdering huáscar, his brother. atahualpa was sentenced to execution by burning. he was horrified, since the inca believed that the soul would not be able to go on to the afterlife if the body were burned.

when christopher columbus arrived on the bahamian island of guanahani (san salvador) in 1492, he encountered the taíno people, whom he described in letters as "naked as the day they were born." taíno influences survived, however, and today appear in the beliefs, religions, language, and music of caribbean cultures.

ad 1492: taíno meet columbus; “new world” gets new diseases. in the bahamas, the taíno are 125,000 strong in 1492 when they encounter the crew and the italian captain of three spanish ships. christopher columbus seeks a shorter sea route to india to spain get a foothold in the profitable spice trade.

hope this

p.s plz make me a brinties