History, 22.12.2019 06:31 imaboss10986

Which statement explains the change in the roman mob’s reaction from the start of act 3.2 to the end of act 3.3?

a. the mob remains calm throughout both speeches.

b. the mob is angry immediately after brutus’ speech but becomes calm by mark antony’s support of the conspirators.

c. the mob weeps and cries throughout both speeches.

d. the mob remains calm and supportive after brutus’ speech but becomes enraged by mark antony’s wanting to rebel and kill the conspirators.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 17:30, kukisbae

In approximately 1500, most american indians in the northeast and the southeast lived and made decisions in

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 00:30, alshaibanihassan10

What was the earliest settlement shown on the map?

Answers: 2

continue

History, 22.06.2019 03:00, dbn4everloved

He government, which was designed for the people, has got into the hands of bosses and their employers, the special interests. an invisible empire has been set up above the forms of democracy. –woodrow wilson who or what does wilson believe is controlling the us government?

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 05:30, toomuch94

Why was galileo galilei brought before the inquisition? for insisting that earth stands still at the center of the universe for proving that planets move in elliptical orbits for putting forth evidence that earth moves around the sun for suggesting that the sun is a star

Answers: 1

continue

You know the right answer?

Which statement explains the change in the roman mob’s reaction from the start of act 3.2 to the end...