How has the Federalist argument that a Bill of Rights being dangerous begun to play out in modern times? In other words, do you think the framers would believe that our current government restricts too many rights?

Explanation:

No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the ... Congress is prohibited from making laws establishing religion or abridging freedom of speech. ... lack of a bill of rights that would place specific limits on government power. Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights,

an unexpected salary cut

the reform movements that arose during the antebellum period in america focused on specific issues: temperance, abolishing imprisonment for debt, pacifism, antislavery, abolishing capital punishment, amelioration of prison conditions (with prison's purpose reconceived as rehabilitation rather than punishment), the humane treatment of animals, the humane and just treatment of native americans, the establishment of public institutions for the care of the destitute, orphans, blind, and mentally ill, the establishment of public schools, the abolition of tobacco use, vegetarianism, health reform, homeopathic medicine, woman's rights (including, at first, especially the establishment of a woman's right to own property apart from her husband and her right to sue for divorce), and the amelioration of labor conditions (including higher pay, the right to form unions, the right to strike, and the demand for limits on the number of work hours, and safe working conditions).

explanation: