In Gideon vs. Wainright (1963), the Supreme Court was asked to decide if a state court has to supply a lawyer to someone who can not afford one. How did the court rule? * The Court said that the state must provide a lawyer if you are too poor to afford one
The Court said that the state does not need to provide a lawyer no matter if the person is poor or not.
The Court said that the state should pay one-half of the lawyer's cost

answer; (d) i believe that the correct answer is americans finally ran out of ammunition;

when a country suffers, for example, a drought period, the market product is affected for a low offer, in this case, potatoes; the government has to tax to the households, which have to give more money for the potatoes which they consume, that situation make them consume substitute goods even through loans, it could increase the financial market movement and the inflationary phenomena, the business has to increase salaries in order to the employees could buy a more expensive food (potatoes) and in order to inflation tha business had to buy expensive supplies in the factor market, while the rest of the world have to gain more money to consume the same amount of potatoes.