During World War II, Presidential Executive Order 9066 and congressional statutes gave the military authority to exclude citizens of Japanese ancestry from areas deemed critical to national defense and potentially vulnerable to espionage. [Fred Toyosaburo] Korematsu remained in San Leandro, California, and violated Civilian Exclusion Order No. 34 of the U. S. Army. After his arrest and relocation, Korematsu appealed to the Supreme Court, citing that his internment was a violation of his basic rights as an American Citizen. The Supreme Court sided with the federal government in its decision. Source: Oyez. org Based on the scenario above, why does the Supreme Court decision in Korematsu reflect judicial restraint?

1800 for sure for sure

Explanation:

the answer would be c

answer: i looked it up

explanation: in 1955 in montgomery, alabama, a girl refused to give up her seat on a public bus. the girl was black, and the passenger looking to take her seat was white. this is a familiar tale, but it's not about rosa parks. the girl in the story is a 15-year-old high school student named claudette colvin, and this act of defiance occurred nine months before rosa parks did the same thing. colvin was arrested, and her case is what led to the u.s. supreme court's order for the desegregation of alabama's bus system. so, why don't we know colvin's name? "later i had a child born out of wedlock; i became pregnant when i was 16," colvin says. "and i didn't fit the image either, of, you know, someone they would want to show off.