Throughout history mankind has preserved evidence of his existence, sometimes intentionally, sometimes unintentionally. In the late nineteenth century some Europeans began the custom of enclosing a collection of goods in "time capsules" to be opened by future generations. Time capsules allow those who open them to glimpse into what life was like in the past. Your assignment is to create a hypothetical time capsule of 10 physical items that represent modern day society. Imagine that this capsule is to be opened in two hundred years. What do you want people 200 years in the future to understand about contemporary society? You should choose your 10 items accordingly. Your capsule should have a consistent message or theme. (Examples-life in modern Memphis, modern Tennessee, the U. S. etc.) You should mention who you hope your audience will be (that is, who should open the capsule). Also, you should specify where you will leave the time capsule and why. (You can choose anywhere on the globe.) Your paper should list each object with a clear detailed description. These 10 objects can be anything that can be moved and will fit into a 3 foot cubic space. Mention why you selected each object and how it ties into your capsule's overall theme. How do you think people will interpret these objects? Your essay must be 400-600 words, double-spaced. Your essay will be evaluated for content, coherence and integration of ideas. Good grammar is expected. No slang is allowed.

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.

answer: nope

explanation: because theirs barely anyone on here to you. but let me see the question. maybe i can , if i know the answer!

a.) are both appointed for life