2. In your opinion, do you think the Bill of Rights is meant to apply in all situations, including times of war? Should it be legal to take away the rights of
a small portion of the American public on a temporary basis if most Americans
believe it will lead to greater security? Explain your opinion.

porter is writing economic history because he is focusing on the cost of developing vaccines.

mustafa ataturk thought nationalism in turkey would best be achieved by modernizing the country.

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.