a) In your opinion, which one of these criticisms was his most compelling argument? Why? (Remember: You do not have to agree with Niebuhr to objectively evaluate the effectiveness of his arguments.) b) Do you think any of his criticisms are relevant to immigrants in the U. S. today? If so, which criticism is valid and why? If not, why not?

scholarship, under the cloak of objective scientific knowledge production, thus reflects the identity and interests of the West, specifically the Anglo-American world, by encouraging its scholars to exclude non-Western systems of thought and using its theoretical perspectives to justify and perpetuate

Explanation:

So i would pick B

try this

explanation: