Which conclusion below best illustrates the correlation between the fact that Britain and France had the two largest empires AND they were on the winning side of the war by 1919? A. Germany attempted to offset the British naval empire by increasing its own naval capacity, but
this didn't work out and so led to Britain being on the winning side.

B. Britain and France had fewer raw materials and resources at their disposal, so they couldn't contribute more the war effort and therefore not have a better chance of winning

C. Britain and France had more raw materials and resources at their disposal, so they could contribute more to the war effort and therefore have a better chance of winning

D. Imperialism wasn't that influential in the startup of the First World War, so there is no correlation here:​

i think they came to washington to protest

in the 1800s, chinese workers migrated to the united states, first to work in the gold mines, but also to take agricultural jobs, and factory work, especially in the garment industry. chinese immigrants were particularly instrumental in building railroads in the american west, and as chinese laborers grew successful in the united states, a number of them became entrepreneurs in their own right. as the numbers of chinese laborers increased, so did the strength of anti-chinese sentiment among other workers in the american economy. this finally resulted in legislation that aimed to limit future immigration of chinese workers to the united states, and threatened to sour diplomatic relations between the united states and china.

hello,

what started the norman conquest?

profound political, administrative, and social changes in the british isles. last line of my information: )

a.opium

hope this