subject
History, 12.03.2021 01:00 beenbad510

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Bush v. Gore decision in 2000? A. It ruled that there was not enough time to hold another recount.
B. It ruled that Al Gore had no grounds to challenge the recount
C. It ruled that George W. Bush had no grounds to challenge the recount.
D. It ruled that, despite being flawed, the recount was still valid.

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 18:30, amandaaaa13
Which sentence best describes the effect of the bill of rights
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 02:30, aryanaengel44
Pl ! the term laissez-faire refers to the government’s approach, in the 1890s, to foreign policy affecting trade. economic policy affecting business. educational policy affecting schools. domestic policy affecting social reform.
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 03:00, gbprulesmile
What is the main purpose of "falling action" in a story?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 03:00, Loveraeee17
The habsburg family rose to power and took control of the?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
How did the Supreme Court rule in the Bush v. Gore decision in 2000? A. It ruled that there was not...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 29.11.2019 00:31