subject
History, 12.03.2021 01:00 beenbad510

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Bush v. Gore decision in 2000? A. It ruled that there was not enough time to hold another recount.
B. It ruled that Al Gore had no grounds to challenge the recount
C. It ruled that George W. Bush had no grounds to challenge the recount.
D. It ruled that, despite being flawed, the recount was still valid.

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 22.06.2019 03:40, malachitorres813
Which statement best describes why henry adams was beaten
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 09:00, Vetinthemaking21
1400s to 1700s: power shifted to persians and ottoman turks of southwest asia, who fought for 300 years in the region. true or false?
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 09:30, albattatasraap5wymy
Which of the following show the new economic ideas were growing in the south in the late 1800s
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 11:00, smartie80
Which of the following traded items would most likely have led to dependency among civilizations during the vedic age?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
How did the Supreme Court rule in the Bush v. Gore decision in 2000? A. It ruled that there was not...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 25.01.2021 20:40