I WILL AWARD BRAINLIEST FOR BEST ANSWER Please answer this seriously, I will report incorrect or unhelpful answers.

Why did the students’ Lawyers argue that the students armbands were protected by the first Amendment?

How did Judge Fortas’s Concept of “Pure speech’ extend the first amendment free speech rights?

PDF linked if Necessary
http://icomets. org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/chap 04s. pdf

1969, the court ruled 7-2 that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.” ... Because wearing a black armband was not disruptive, the court held that the First Amendment protected the right of students to wear them.

because the 5th amendment was designed to protect the rights of persons accused of crimes, including protection against double jeopardy, self-incrimination, and punishment without due process of law.

the answer is b. hope this !

khdkajd; lkad 'lk; aldkdjladkjkldhla

explanation:

hadkhadkhapkldjlkajdlfja