How did the Court's opinion in the Cherokee Nation case differ from Worcester?

In Cherokee Nation, the Court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction (the power to hear a case) to review claims of an Indian nation within the United States. In Worcester, the Court ruled that only the United States, and not the individual states, had power to regulate or deal with the Indian nations.

Explanation:

In Cherokee Nation, the Court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction (the power to hear a case) to review claims of an Indian nation within the United States. In Worcester, the Court ruled that only the United States, and not the individual states, had the power to regulate or deal with the Indian nations.

Explanation:

the soviet union wanted to impose communist governments in eastern europe.

a flatwork hope this