Which claim can best be supported by this passage?
new technology made warfare more destructive

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

...At times, gas has been known to travel, with dire results, fi fteen miles behind the lines. A gas, or smoke helmet, as it is called, at the best is a vile-smelling thing, and it is not long before one gets a violent headache from wearing it. Our eighteen-pounders were bursting in No Man’s Land, in an effort, by the artillery, to disperse the gas clouds. The fi re step was lined with crouching men, bayonets fi xed, and bombs near at hand to repel the expected attack. Our artillery had put a barrage of curtain fi re on the German lines, to try and break up their attack and keep back re-inforcements. I trained my machine gun on their trench and its bullets were raking the parapet [spraying the wall]. Then over they came, bayonets glistening. In their respirators, which have a large snout in front, they looked like some horrible nightmare...

Which claim can best be supported by this passage?

(1) New technology made warfare more destructive.

(2) Warfare had a limited impact on the environment.

(3) Countries engaged in war were punished for their actions.

(4) Illness and disease took many lives.

(1) New technology made warfare more destructive.

Explanation:

The text shows how technology has made wars more destructive and impactful. This is because it presents a narrator that exposes the participation of technology involving the combat with gas used in more modern wars that forced soldiers to enter an even more terrifying environment and in an even more deadly and dangerous battle than those seen in previous wars with the most archaic and least evolved technology.

what is this news

explanation:

imperialism and colonization in 1936

part of the politics series

basic forms of government

power structure

separation

associated state dominion chiefdom

federalism

federation confederation devolution

integration

empire hegemony unitary state

administrative division

power source

democracy

power of many

direct representative liberal social demarchy others

oligarchy

power of few

anocracy aristocracy plutocracy kakistocracy kraterocracy stratocracy timocracy meritocracy technocracy geniocracy noocracy kritarchy particracy ergatocracy netocracy

autocracy

power of one

despotism dictatorship military dictatorship

others

anarchy theocracy

power ideology

monarchy vs. republic

socio-political ideologies

absolute legalist

constitutional

parliamentary directorial semi-presidential presidential

authoritarian vs. libertarian

socio-economic ideologies

tribalism despotism feudalism colonialism distributism anarchism socialism communism totalitarianism

global vs. local

geo-cultural ideologies

commune city-state national government intergovernmental organisation world government

politics portal

vte

an empire is a sovereign state functioning as an aggregate of nations or people that are ruled over by an emperor or another kind of monarch. the territory and population of an empire is commonly of greater extent than the one of a kingdom.[1]

an empire can be made solely of contiguous territories, such as the austro-hungarian empire or the russian empire, or of territories far remote from the homeland, such as a colonial empire. aside from the more formal usage, the word empire can also refer colloquially to a large-scale business enterprise (e.g. a transnational corporation), a political organisation controlled by a single individual (a political boss), or a group (political bosses).[2] the word empire is associated with such other words as imperialism, colonialism, and globalization. empire is often used to describe a displeasure to overpowering situations.[3]