Justice Thurgood Marshall: What, in any of these tapes, is involved in the impeachment proceedings?Attorney for the President, James St. Clair: Well, if Your Honor please, the House of Representatives have subpoenaed these and more tapes. Justice Marshall: Well, I don’t know which of the tapes. I assume you do. Mr. St. Clair: No, I don’t. Justice Marshall: You don’t know either. Well, how do you know that they’re subject to the greater privilege?Mr. St. Clair: Regardless of what it is and may involve a number of subjects. Justice Marshall: But you don’t know. ...You’re submitting the matter to this Court. Mr. St. Clair: To this Court, under a special appearance on behalf of the President. Justice Marshall: You still leave it up to this Court to decide it. Mr. St. Clair: In the sense that this Court has an obligation to determine the law, alright? The President also has an obligation to carry out his constitutional functions. Justice Marshall: You are submitting to this court for us to decide whether or not executive privilege is available in this case. Mr. St. Clair: Well, probably, the question is even more limited than that. Is the executive privilege, which my brother [opposing counsel] concedes, absolute or is it only conditional?Justice Marshall: I said, in this case. Can you make it any narrower than that?Mr. St. Clair: No, sir. a.How might the conversation between Justice Marshall and Mr. St. Clair relate to Marbury v. Madison?

theodore roosevelt 26th u.s. president : i admire his energy and passion. he was a fundamentally good man, brilliantly intelligent, possessed of extraordinary will and ability, supremely self-confident, bold, egalitarian, idealistic…. , lord, can we have him back?

it is a : ) always outside of government control

1. yes it was the new deal introduced lots of regulations to workers, such as the national labour relations act of 1935 which workers to form unions and protected the members from other laws as well as forcing businesses to listen to the unions and their workers

2.the new deal had a lot of great ideas. but when fdr created the national industrial recovery act. they set prizes and work hours for the workers. the workers made more money ($.40 rather than $.20) but because they did not work as much they would end up making less money. after a while the supreme court found this act to be un-constitutional. but sense the people weren’t   making as much money they could not afford the products. even though the new deal was taken away in 1939 because the government became to powerful, there are still remnants of it in our government. national labor relations, social security, etc… the new deal alone did not end the depression but it the u.s.a dramatically and set them on the right track to recover and become the powerhouse of a country it is today.

3. yes it did bring some relief to those who were willing and able to work and it assisted in terms of creating new and strengthening existing infrastructure.  

4.