HELPP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST IF RIGHT Should the U. S. Senate have ratified (passed into law) the Treaty of New Echota?
Background: John Ross was the Principal Chief of the Cherokee Nation. He was the son of a Scottish Immigrant and a Cherokee mother. He wrote this letter to Congress in response to the New Echota Treaty being approved and before the Trail of Tears began.
“The treaty in question is not the act of our Nation; it has not received the sanction (approval) of our people. The makers of the treaty hold no office nor appointment in our Nation, [and have no] authority to assume the reins of Government, and to make bargain and sale of our rights, our possessions, and our common country. And we sadly declare, that the enforcement of the conditions of this treaty, against our consent, is an act of injustice and oppression …
And, therefore, we, the parties to be affected by the result, appeal with confidence to the justice, the magnanimity, the compassion, of your honorable bodies, against the enforcement, on us, this treaty,, in the formation of which we have had no say.”

Claim - The U. S. Senate should not have ratified the Treaty of New Echota.
Evidence

Cite evidence from the document that supports your claim
Reasoning

Explain how the evidence supports your claim

Learning Task 1: Fill out the table with the correct information. You may ask the

help of your guardian or you may

research from the internet for this activity. Write

your answers on your answer sheet.

Country

Location

Neighboring

countries

Description of Music

Japan

China

KoreaLearning Task 1: Fill out the table with the correct information. You may ask the

help of your guardian or you may

research from the internet for this activity. Write

your answers on your answer sheet.

Country

Location

Neighboring

countries

Description of Music

Japan

China

KoreaPLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIESTPLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST

"The treaty in question is not the act of our Nation; it has not received the sanction (approval) of our people. The makers of the treaty hold no office nor appointment in our Nation, [and have no] authority to assume the reins of Government, and to make bargain and sale of our rights, our possessions, and our common country. And we sadly declare, that the enforcement of the conditions of this treaty, against our consent, is an act of injustice and oppression" John Ross explains that the Treaty doesn't have the approval of the people, how the treaty is flawed, and how it is ill-treatment of the people. It gives a clear description of the cons of ratifying the New Echota Treaty.

anti-semitism hope this !

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.