What were the opposing viewpoints that Texans debated regarding the future of their nation? Check all of the boxes that apply. annexation by the United States becoming a province of Mexico forming a confederation with Canada and Cuba remaining independent

1. annexation by the United States

2. remaining independent

Explanation:

The opposing viewpoints that Texans debated regarding the future of their nation were whether to have:

1. annexation by the United States

2. remaining independent

This is because the Texans moved away from Mexico to remain independent. However, in order not to be later conquered by the Mexican government, the Texans need felt they need to join the United States to protect themselves.

its 1 and 4

Explanation:

got right on edge

the doctrine of nullification recommended that states living inside the union have the one-sided, inalienable ideal to void any law made by the national government that could be esteemed illegal.

the united states was shaped based on a general agreement among its individual states. hence, it is inferred that under the hypothesis of invalidation, since the states are the establishment of the union, they have the ability to referee and disprove unlawful laws.

the fifth and fourteenth amendments to the united states constitution each contain a due process clause. due process deals with the administration of justice and thus the due process clause acts as a safeguard from arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property by the government outside the sanction of law.

hope this =d give me brainliest