Why was the Missouri Compromise necessary?
(Choose 3)
Slaveholding states were worried...
History, 26.02.2021 20:40 daphnevlogs11
Why was the Missouri Compromise necessary?
(Choose 3)
Slaveholding states were worried that anti-slavery legislation might make it through Congress if there was not an equal number of slave and free states.
Abolitionists did not want to add new slaveholding areas to the Union.
Northern states threatened to secede if slavery was allowed in western states.
Abolitionists demanded support for states’ rights to self-determination on the slavery issue.
Slaveholding states thought that new states should be able to determine whether or not to allow slavery.
Free African Americans demanded a place they could live with the same freedoms and protections as other citizens enjoyed.
Answers: 2
History, 21.06.2019 23:30, treyceratops1082
Reflect on what you learned in this lesson. write two paragraphs (150-250 words) explaining the benefits of studying history.
Answers: 3
History, 22.06.2019 01:00, liljobe8973
Which of the following arguments decided the debate over using the atomic bomb against japan in 1945? using the bomb would destroy the armaments still available to japanese forces in japan. using the bomb would demonstrate the power of the united states to the entire world. using the bomb would shorten the war and avoid heavy casualties among invading troops. using the bomb would enable allied forces to invade and take over the japanese mainland
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 05:00, leslychavez0269
Who were the main leaders of the major powers (france, england, and great britain) during the treaty of versailles?
Answers: 2
History, 22.06.2019 12:00, afolmar2006
What caused the formation of the whig party? the veto by andrew jackson of the bill renewing the national bank the election of andrew jackson the tariff of abominations the nullification crisis and south carolina’s secession threat
Answers: 3
Chemistry, 25.08.2019 03:20
English, 25.08.2019 03:20