In 1834, Dred Scott was a slave in the state of Missour, which was a slave state. His master took him into linois, a free state, and then to Wisconsin, a free teritory, and then back to Missouri. Scott was suing for his freedom based on what grounds ? A. This lawsuit was after the Emancipation Proclamation, and slavery was illegal. B. Based on popular sovereignty, Missouri was to become a free state the next year C. He had been a slave for 10 years; therefore, by law he should have been freed. D. He felit his residence in the free areas had made him a free man.
Answers: 3
Other questions on the subject: History
History, 21.06.2019 22:00, annabanana1298
How does an appellate court differ from a trial court a. an appellate court usually has a jury b. an appellate court decides issues of facts c. an appellate court examines more witnesses d. an appellate court reviews another courts decision
Answers: 2
History, 22.06.2019 02:00, rsimmons696
Whose plan centered on keeping the federal budget balanced, instituting tax cuts, and developing public works projects?
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 08:00, Worldprofessor6252
Nazi germany practiced this form of nationalism. cultural religious ethnic political
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 09:00, gbrightwell
Analyze how napoleon used a coup d'etat to establish absolute rule.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In 1834, Dred Scott was a slave in the state of Missour, which was a slave state. His master took hi...
Questions in other subjects:
Mathematics, 22.10.2019 22:10
History, 22.10.2019 22:10
Geography, 22.10.2019 22:10
