History, 23.02.2021 01:50 Jerjer3864

5. The passage below is from the Supreme Court decision, Marbury v. Madison (1803). "It is ... [the] duty of the judicial [branch] to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must... interpret that rule... So, if a law (conflicts with] the Constitution, ... the Court must either decide that case (in favor of] the law, disregarding the Constitution, or (in favor of] the Constitution, disregarding the law... This is of the very essence of judicial duty." What conclusion did the Court reach to solve the problem identified in the passage? (3 Points) It had to come up with a new law of its own. It should follow the law because it was more recent. It must strike down any law that contradicts the Constitution. It could choose to follow either the law or the Constitution.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 13:30, JessTaylr04

Around 530 a. d., emperor justinian organized a group of legal scholars to collect and organize all roman law into written form. the justinian codex was created because justinian wanted to strengthen his large empire with

Answers: 1

continue

History, 21.06.2019 17:00, diametriagay

According to thomas hobbes concept of the social contract, what do people exchange for the protection by the government?

Answers: 1

continue

History, 21.06.2019 17:20, djjohnson3120

How was classical persia's extensive network of roads important to its civilization?

Answers: 1

continue

History, 21.06.2019 20:30, kiingbr335yoqzaxs

Why didn’t the united states participate in the league of nations? the u. s. senate did not want the country to join. president wilson did not want the country to join. the league of nations was only for european countries. the league of nations had failed to prevent world war 1

Answers: 1

continue

You know the right answer?

5. The passage below is from the Supreme Court decision, Marbury v. Madison (1803). "It is ... [the]...