During the 1925 scopes trial, the prosecution’s main argument was that
darwin’s theory of evolution was not scientific.
darwin’s theory of evolution was scientific.
schools had to teach biblical creationism.
evolution should be taught along with creation.

The main argument put forward by the prosecution, during the Scopes trial in 1925, was that schools ought to teach the theory of creationism purely on the lines of the Bible.

Further Explanation:

Formally known as The State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes, the Scopes Monkey Trial, as was the case commonly called, was a legal case in the United States in 1925. In 1925, the legislature of the Tennessee state had outlawed the teaching of anything, which denied the divine origin of the creation and man, as taught by the Bible.

In this case, John Scopes, a substitute high school teacher, was charged with violating Tennessee’s Butler Act, according to which teaching of human evolution, which was the theory propounded by Charles Darwin, was unlawful. The prosecution, led by William Jennings Bryan, was on the side of the Fundamentalists, against the defense-backed Modernists, who were led by Clarence Darrow. The former argued that God’s word on creation, as was written in the Holy Bible, was to be prioritized over human knowledge.  

After hearing the arguments put forward by both the prosecution and the defense in this case, decided to simply ask as to whether or not John Thomas Scopes had taught the theory of evolution, according to the views put forward by Charles Darwin. Ultimately, when John Scopes, admitted that he had taught the theory of evolution on the lines of Darwinism, he was convicted and fined $100.  

Learn more:

1. Which of the following was a religious movement at the turn of the twentieth century that sought justice for the less fortunate?

2. Which issue did the supreme court answer in the case of Duncan v. Louisiana?

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: Prohibition

Keywords:

Bible, Tennessee, Butler Act, Charles Darwin, William Jennings Bryan, Fundamentalists, Modernists, Clarence Darrow .

4 copper and gold, the california gold rush is why im pretty sure.

isaiah 53: 4-6 and   romans 5: 6-8 speak how jesus was pierced for our transgressions,   crushed for our iniquities and that god demonstrates his own love for us in this: while we were still sinners, christ died for us, and by his wounds we are all healed.   psalm 22: 6-7 and   matthew 27: 39-40   correlate basically by the fact that all of the people who didn´t believe in jesus, were telling him that if he was so powerful as he said he was, he should save himself.     matthew 27: 35 and psalm 22: 18 refers about how they divided his clothes among them   and cast lots for his garment. isaiah 53: 8-9 and matthew 27: 57-60 express the process of the burial of jesus. psalm 22: 15-16 and luke 23: 33-34 speak about his crucifiction, the humilliation of being surrounded by sinners, and asking the lord for mercy for humanity. finally in john 19: 33-35   and isaiah 53: 12 speak about the most important prophecy, the testimony of a living god, who resurrected and buried all of our sins and guilt, for all of us. when he was crucified a man saw a sudden flow of blood and water from his wound, and he gived testimony, for all o us to believe, that he poured out his life unto death,   and was numbered with the transgressors.   for he bore the sin of many,   and made intercession for the transgressors.