Original passage below, taken from: Wade, Peter. Race and Ethnicity in Latin America. London and Chicago: Pluto Press, 1997 But it is no coincidence that just as abolitionist opinion gained dominance in Europe, making the institutionalized inferiority of blacks morally insecure, theories [claiming to be 'scientific'] began to emerge that could justify the continued dominance over blacks (not to mention Native Americans, Asians and Orientals) in terms of supposedly innate and permanent inferiority and now with the full power of scientific backing (Wade, 1997: 11). As Peter Wade argues, oppression of non-whites was maintained, even when the rise of abolitionist ideas in Europe made the institutionalized inferiority of blacks morally insecure, by the spread of racist ideology posing as scientific theories (Wade, 1997: 11). Is this plagiarism?
1) True
2) False

This is not plagiarism.

Explanation:

As we can see in the text presented in the question above, the author showed the bibliographic reference where he removed the information he wished to present. He also did this when he made a quote to the author of the original text. In this case, we can state that the author of the text presented, gave due credit to the author who originally presented this information, issuing the correct bibliographic reference. In that case, there was no plagiarism.

freedom of speech is also protected by the 1 amendment.

explanation:

here is pretty much what the 1st amendment says:

congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

monopolies  came to the united states with the colonial administration. the large-scale public works needed to make the new world hospitable to old world immigrants required large companies to carry them out. these companies were granted exclusive contracts for these works by the colonial administrators. even after the american revolution, many of these colonial holdovers still functioned due to the contracts and land

read more on -