Any differences between the Women's Suffrage movement and the Civil Rights movement? (it can be strategies, struggles, leaderships)

There were a lot of similarities, and differences. The women's movement was more likely white middle or upper class women to begin with, the Civil Rights movement, of course was primarily African Americans but also whites were involved.

The Women's movement started with the suffrage movement, to get women the right to vote and that happened in 1919, I believe.

Women were somewhat quiet over the next 40 years or so, of course during WWII, many women worked in factories, etc. but there was no 'women's movement", just a need for workers, after the war things went back to 'normal' with women at home raising kids and cooking dinner. (In, according to TV perfectly kept houses while they were in dresses and pearls and high heels)

By the 1960's, the civil rights movement was inspiring a lot of other groups, including Latinos, women and eventually Gays.

Women who were in the lead were not fighting poverty for the most part, at least for themselves. They were often from middle class families but were well educated, but a woman at the time could go to college, get a degree and work as a teacher or secretary until she got married. Then it was over. Unless her husband died, or she became one of the ever growing number of divorced women, she probably would not work or use her degree or experience.  

I was young at the time, but I do remember as late as the 60's, at least one family where the husband refused to let his wife drive, because he did not like "women drivers". This woman and at least one other did not vote, because 'that was something for men to know about' (I'm talking 1960's, not 1860's!)  

The Civil Rights movement was more extensive among many classes of African Americans. While there were many educated and  middle class Blacks involved in the leadership, it included the poor to a great extent. There was probably more support for Civil Rights among the grass root African Americans than for the Women's movement among a lot of white people, even women. Many thought they were either 'kooks', or some thought they were either all lesbians, or that they were ' too ugly to get a man', even though many were married women.

Hope this helped.

the industrial development of cities in the ruhr area in the nineteenth century is described. the research was based on english and german language sources. several factors that shaped growth and paths of the cities were categorized and analyzed. they are locations, resources, traditions, entrepreneurs, and technological developments. locations and resources were the most important among them; other factors may be regarded as consequences from locations and resources. among the cities, bochum, essen, gelsenkirchen, and dortmund had the richest resources and most favorable locations in the transportation network and grew to be the largest cities in the ruhr area near the end of the nineteenth century. riverside location was also a favorable factor for the development, as shown in the development of duisburg on the confluence of rhine and ruhr. resource distribution can explain the rise of textile industry, metallurgical industry, and coal and iron industries, and the northward progression of the mining industry. tradition was an important factor for cities such as krefeld, barmen, elberfeld, solingen, and remscheid, which experienced development based on their traditions through the nineteenth century. various entrepreneurs exerted influences within and beyond the local level over the ruhr area. technological development stimulated the northward progression of the mining industry and the deep connection between the coal and the iron industries.