Asap i'll give pionts

24. describe the relationship between the patricians and plebeians in rome and how their relationship influences roman politics. (2 points)

25. a political power that is still in use in today, the tribunes of ancient rome had the power to or block laws, in the roman senate that they disapproved of.

26. what was the purpose of the position of dictator in ancient rome?

27. explain the rise and fall of the roman empire. your response must be written in complete sentences and include (1) julius caesar, (2) augustus, (3) diocletian, and (4) constantine to receive credit. (3 points)

24) Between about 615 B.C. and 510 B.C., Rome was rule by the Etruscan, a powerful civilization from ancient Italy. During this period, the upper-class citizens were called Patricians. They used the held the most high and important offices. The lower-class citizens were called Plebeians. They represented the poor party of the people from farmers, peasants, etc… In 510 B.C., the patricians rebelled, removed the Etruscan King, and created an empire of their own, with a republic Policy, and they held all the power, while the plebeians were nothing. The plebeians of course didn’t like that and began to ask for political equality, but the Patricians never answered their demands. Over time, a conflict, called the conflict of orders, grew between those 2 classes. In about 495 B.C., the Plebeians, who were in a very big quantity representing 95% of the population, left the city and camped in a nearby hill, and didn’t approved to come back until the Patricians gave them their rights. Rome was in crisis. The farms were abandoned, and the Patricians feared that they get in war with a lack of soldiers. So Patricians had to give political rights to the Plebeians, and creating a council for them “the Council of Plebs”. This conflict between the Patricians and the Plebeians transformed the policy of Rome from a Republic to a Democratic Empire.

25) A political power that is still in use in today, the tribunes of Ancient Rome had the power to Veto, or block laws, in the Roman Senate that they disapproved of.

26) The Dictator in Ancient Rome was the one Responsible of the whole empire. He was the one dealing with Surprise attacks and military emergencies and all this kind of stuff. All the tribunes and magistrates were under his command, and the veto could not be used against his decisions. But of course he was limited between some severe rules which he hadn't got the rights to break.

27) It all started when Emperor Augustus, Grand nephew of Julius Caesar, Defeated Antony and Cleopatra in the battle of Actium. He Built a lot of infrastructures in the empire, established a strong money system, established fire and police departments, and encouraged the growth of Business. In addition, the Roman Empire controlled the whole Mediterranean with almost no warfare. By the reign of Diocletian, the Empire covered 5 million square kilometers, dividing the empire into Western and Eastern. Then, his successor Constantine Byzantium, capital of the Byzantine Empire, and renamed it Constantinople. During his reign, the rise of a new Religion: Christianity, was a major factor of the beginning of the fall of the Roman Empire. It was completely different from the traditional Romans beliefs. Some years later, Christianity became the official religion of the empire and changed the whole policy. The 2 roman empires were reunited under the leadership of Constantinople. At last, Germanic barbarian tribes attacked Rome and completely dominated it, and the 1000 years Empire had fallen.

Well I'm sorry for question 27 if it isn't really clear or something I get lost when I have to use specific words in my answer to get the credits :p

I hope this Helps! ^^

the bar kochba rebellion (132-135) against the roman empire, also known as the second jewish-roman war, was the second major jewish revolt in judea and the last of the great jewish-roman wars.

after the first jewish-roman war of the years 66-73, the roman authorities took measures to crush any new attempt of rebellion in judea. his political situation was modified and instead of a prefect a governor of praetorian rank was appointed, and in the ruins of jerusalem the seat of a complete roman legion, the legio x fretensis was established.

the political and religious direction of the jewish people was left in the hands of the sanhedrin, with initial headquarters in yavne.

the direct causes of the rebellion vary according to the source. the roman historian dio cassius (155-229) attributes the revolt to the decision of hadrian to found in the place of jerusalem a roman city called aelia capitolina (aelia by its own name and capitolina in honor of the roman god jupiter). on the other hand, the jewish sources, while recognizing this resolution as true, assign higher priority to the decrees dictated by hadrian that forbade the brit milah (circumcision), the respect of the sabbath and the laws of purity in the family.

hadrian's intention was to "civilize" and incorporate the jews once and for all into the greco-roman culture. for greek and roman culture, circumcision was an intolerable mutilation.

the jewish tradition tells in the midrash tanjuma a meeting between rabbi akiva and the governor turnus rufus, where he asked for an explanation about the circumcision.

an additional legion, the legio vi ferrata, moved to the province to maintain order, and work began in the year 131 after the governor of judea, turnus rufus performed the founding ceremony of aelia capitolina. a roman coin with the inscription aelia capitolina was struck in the year 132.

the tannaim rabbi akiva, who without being named nasi directed the sanhedrin, convinced the other members to support the imminent rebellion.

the jewish leaders carefully planned the second rebellion to avoid the numerous errors that had been committed in the first one. in the year 132 the rebellion led by bar kochba quickly expanded from modiim throughout the country, defeating the x roman legion based in jerusalem and destroying the xxii roman legion that had come from egypt.

the governor can not veto a referendum that the voters approve