subject
History, 10.02.2021 02:00 andrespeerman

I think in both Vietnam and Korea we committed military forces without an intention to win, and indeed with a feeling that we could achieve some of our objectives simply by having some men there who would participate in limited kinds of activity, but in the case of Korea told not to win, and in the case of Vietnam clearly without the intention of applying the degree of force necessary to win. That's a very terrible thing to do to military people – to ask them to go into extreme danger, but in effect to have a decision made that it's not important enough for us to win. —Caspar Weinberger,
Secretary of defense in Reagan administration,
1987

What reason does Weinberger give for the United States losing the war?

The United States had never fought in a jungle setting before.
The United States’ troops were not strong enough to fight.
The United States entered the war without a real commitment to the conflict.
The United States should have followed the same approach as in the Korean War.

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 22.06.2019 01:30, romeroalexis817
Which of the following acts or treaties tried to american indians?
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 05:00, cjdolce9790
In the latter stages of the civil war who was given the responsibility of winning the war for the north
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 08:00, leo4687
What was the grimke sisters' argument for equal rights for women based on?
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 12:20, jiedwards3835
What is the fundamental idea behind the fourteenth amendment to the constitution
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
I think in both Vietnam and Korea we committed military forces without an intention to win, and inde...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Chemistry, 25.09.2019 05:40