The excerpt below was written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in the decision of Schenck v. United States (1919). The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shounting fire in a theatre and causing a panic The question in everycase is whether the words used are used in such curcumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that congress has a right to prevent.

Which conduct did the U. S Supreme Court determine was a “clear and present danger” in this case?

demonstrations in which protestors burned American flags

newspaper articles criticizing U. S. entry into the war

the presence of Japanese Americans on the West Coast

the mailing of pamphlets advising young men to resist the draft

The mailing of pamphlets advising young men to resist the draft

Explanation:

As much as every American is entitled to freedom of speech by the First Commandment, according to the case of Schenck v. United States (1919), that does not apply when the words spoken created a clear and present danger.

This is what the defendants in the case had done when they mailed pamphlets to young men urging them to resist a draft into the U.S. army even though the Americans were now at war with Germany in the first World War.

especially research the treaty of greenville and the treaty of colerain in washington's administration.   also research at least one significant treaty from the administrations of adams, jefferson, and madison. tell the outcome of each treaty and how it did or did not in the further development of the west.

treaty of greenville (1814) the treaty of greenville (1814) was called a treaty of peace and friendship between the united states of america and the tribes of native americans called the wyandots, delawares, shawanoese, senacas and miamies.

the treaty of colerain was signed at st. marys, georgia in camden county, georgia, by benjamin hawkins, george clymer, and andrew pickens for the united states and representatives of the creek nation, for whom indian trader langley bryant served as an interpreter, on june 29, 1796, proclaimed on march 18, 1797, and codified as 7 stat. 56. colerain was a small community and the site of a u.s. indian factory founded by james seagrove.  

this treaty affirmed the binding of the treaty of new york (1790). the treaties of hopewell and the treaty of holston (1791) established boundary lines between the choctaws, chickasaws, cherokee, and the u.s. the treaty of colerain bound the creek nation to acknowledge the boundaries established in those treaties.  

it also established the boundary line between the creek nation and the united states. at the time of this treaty, the boundaries between spanish florida and the u.s. had not yet been established. this treaty formally allowed the creek chiefs to acknowledge the negotiation for delineating the georgia-florida boundary with spain.  

the treaty contained a provision that the president of the u.s. may establish a trading or military outpost.  

the united states demanded that the creeks give up their american prisoners and also return all "citizens, white inhabitants, negroes and property" taken by the creeks.  

the treaty describes when it would take effect. after the treaty had been signed but not yet promulgated, the u.s. senate requested modification of two articles of the treaty. the first modification stipulated that the military or trading posts would be under the control of the united states. the second modification stipulated that if the u.s. no longer required the use of those posts, the locations would revert to the creek people.  

the correct answer to your question is c the factory goes out of business, causing the workers to lose their jobs.

explanation: