Why was the Doolittle Raid considered a "moral victory"? A)It proved that America was still able to fight after Pearl Harbor

B)It allowed the US to take control of the Philippines

C)It destroyed half of Tokyo

D)It led to the immediate surrender of Japan

realmente cosas malas! ¡la explicación está abajo, para más recursos siga el enlace!

  en la francia revolucionaria, la asamblea legislativa vota para abolir la monarquía y establecer la primera república. la medida se produjo un año después de que el rey luis xvi aprobara a regañadientes una nueva constitución que lo despojó de gran parte de su poder.

aquí está el enlace: https: //

espero que esto te ayude, pero solo para hacerte saber, el sitio web no está en español. si quieres que lo traduzca solo tienes que preguntar.

all of the following apply except for (a. excessive credit on real estate resulting in defaulted loans.

in 1819, panic swept the country due,in part, to the rapid expansion of american manufacturing during the war of 1812 and the distress caused by the post-war british competition. the rapid expansion of american farming was another factor.

explanation:

the phenomenon that would be cited as evidence of increased economic interdependence between europe and the americas is  the development of mercantilism.

this theory suggests that the wealth of a country depends on its economic assets, or capital.

hope this : )

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is