How were the results of the big stick policy, dollar diplomacy, and moral diplomacy similar in latin america?
a. people in latin america welcomed the increase in us investments.
b. people in latin america worked to create democracies in their countries.
c. people in latin america were angry at us actions.
d. people in latin america hoped the us would continue their governments.

I believe the answer is: C. People in Latin America were angry at US actions.

All of those ideology was created as an effort to obtain foreign policies that beneficial with united states. Basically, those ideologies dictate that US shall never make a direct threat to obtain benefit in negotiation, but must always have military backers to appear strong an authoritative.

In the perspective of other countries' , such method of negotiation is perceived as an act of intimidation, which is why many people in Latin America were angry at united states.

julius caesar turned the roman republic into the roman empire by coming in and taking the "dictator" role during the time of a civil war (elites vs lower classes) winning battles and reputation, then declaring him dictator for life

hope this : )