Prompt Think about the debate, and evaluate in a three-paragraph essay (4-5 sentences each) which claims were more clearly supported by reasons and evidence. Be sure to consider which speaker’s arguments and explanations best match the available evidence, and which one acknowledged where the evidence leaves matters uncertain.

A full-credit response includes the following elements:

The claims made by then-President Carter on the issue of inflation during the debate. Deduction of 5 percentage points if the explanation of the claims is weak, and 10 points if it is missing.
The reasons and evidence Carter used to support his claims. Deduction of 5 percentage points if the explanation of the reasons and evidence is incomplete, and 10 points if it is missing.
The claims made by future President Reagan on the issue of inflation during the debate. Deduction of 5 percentage points if the explanation of the claims is weak, and 10 points if it is missing.
The reasons and evidence Reagan used to support his claims. Deduction of 5 percentage points if the explanation of the reasons and evidence is incomplete, and 10 points if it is missing.
An evaluation of both speakers’ arguments in relation to the available evidence. Deduction of 10 percentage points if the evaluation is weak, and 20 points if it is missing.
Supporting evidence in the form of details, statistics, facts, and quotations. Deduction of 10 percentage points if the evidence is weak, and 20 points if it is missing.
Correct grammar and mechanics. Deduction of 5–20 points for errors in grammar and mechanics, depending on the severity of the errors.