Which positions did Britain's prime minister support at the Paris Peace Conference? Check all that apply. - He wanted to preserve Britain's trading relationship with Germany.
- He advocated for Germany's armed forces to be dismantled.
- He felt Germany should be broken up into two smaller countries.
- He supported forcing Germany to return the Alsace-Lorraine to France.
- He sought to create a secret alliance with Germany to ensure future peace,
- He believed treating Germany harshly would lead to future conflicts.

People often take decision that best fits them.

The positions did Britain's prime minister support at the Paris Peace Conference are:

The Paris Peace Conference is known to be a very popular conference. The attendance consist of British Prime Minister David Lloyd George, President Woodrow Wilson of the United States, French Premier Georges Clemenceau, among others.

Lloyd George was known to have went into the Paris Peace Conference already prepared to accept a compromise peace.

The PM did support the hanging the Kaiser, and punishing Germany for begining the war. He voice his intentions for Germany to be disarm and also weaken its Navy to avoid a future threat to Britain.

Learn more The Conference from

link

1. He wanted to preserve Britain's trading relationship with Germany.

2. He advocated for Germany's armed forces to be dismantled.

3. He believed treating Germany harshly would lead to future conflicts.

Explanation:

Following the end of World War I that lasted between 1914 to 1918. The positions of Britain's prime minister support at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 were clear and concise.

His position can be summarily presented to be that:

1. He wanted to preserve Britain's trading relationship with Germany: one of the reasons behind this position is to ensure that Germany can pay for their reparations.

2. He advocated for Germany's armed forces to be dismantled: the reason behind this is to prevent future wars, revenge, or conflict from Germany.

3. He believed treating Germany harshly would lead to future conflicts.

These positions were evident when declared during the treaties among others that "We must not let any sense of revenge, any spirit of greed, any grasping desire override the fundamental principles of righteousness."

answer; /// the correct answer is evidence of the olmec civilization has been found in southern american in a hot steamy forest, archaeologists have found earthen artifacts at several sites that were evidence of the olmec civilization. these   artifacts were mounds,courtyards and pyramids build of stones, also on top of the mounds were many monuments made of stone, some of these stone structures are very large, they weigh as much as 44

from thales, who is often considered the first western philosopher, to the stoics and skeptics, ancient greek philosophy opened the doors to a particular way of thinking that provided the roots for the western intellectual tradition. here, there is often an explicit preference for the life of reason and rational thought. we find proto-scientific explanations of the natural world in the milesian thinkers, and we hear democritus posit atoms—indivisible and invisible units—as the basic stuff of all matter. with socrates comes a sustained inquiry into ethical matters—an orientation towards human living and the best life for human beings. with plato comes one of the most creative and flexible ways of doing philosophy, which some have since attempted to imitate by writing philosophical dialogues covering topics still of interest today in ethics, political thought, metaphysics, and epistemology. plato’s student, aristotle, was one of the most prolific of ancient authors. he wrote treatises on each of these topics, as well as on the investigation of the natural world, including the composition of animals. the hellenists—epicurus, the cynics, the stoics, and the skeptics—developed schools or movements devoted to distinct philosophical lifestyles, each with reason at its foundation.

with this preference for reason came a critique of traditional ways of living, believing, and thinking, which sometimes caused political trouble for the philosophers themselves. xenophanes directly challenged the traditional anthropomorphic depiction of the gods, and socrates was put to death for allegedly inventing new gods and not believing in the gods mandated by the city of athens. after the fall of alexander the great, and because of aristotle’s ties with alexander and his court, aristotle escaped the same fate as socrates by fleeing athens. epicurus, like xenophanes, claimed that the mass of people is impious, since the people conceive of the gods as little more than superhumans, even though human characteristics cannot appropriately be ascribed to the gods. in short, not only did ancient greek philosophy pave the way for the western intellectual tradition, including modern science, but it also shook cultural foundations in its own time.