Whenever archaeologists excavate a site, they use primary and secondary sources to learn about that site and its artifacts. Are these research methods enough to give complete information about the discovered site or artifact? What other methods do you suggest to help uncover more information about the archaeological find? Do you think that information gained from oral history is helpful or misleading while concluding an archaeological find?

architecture i think.

i hope this !

option d is correct. corroborated sources of historical evidence   is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history.

historians tend to use written sources, but audio and visual materials as well as artifacts are important objects that supply information to modern historians.

historical sources are usually divided into two categories: primary and secondary sources. depending on the historian's intent, some sources shift their designation. determining what type of sources toimplement, and the level of credibility and reliability of those sources, is a significant step in critical thinking for the historian.

explanation:

thomas jefferson is the answer

the united states began searching for a way to reduce oil

-agarvated