How should we remember the dropping of the atomic bomb?(WWII US History)

We should remember it as a traumatic experience in everyone's life guilt and grief.

Explanation:

The Atomic bomb is what ended WWII, but it was by taking 100 of thousands innocent life's. The bomb could be remembered as a triumph or as victimization of the Japanese. We see it as victimization of the Japanese. The government could have dropped it in a non-populated area in an attempt to scare them, but they intended to kill 100's of thousands of people. They chose Hiroshima to test the amount of damage it would cause on a highly populated city and to test how the radiation reacted with humans. Instead of dropping the Atomic bomb to end the war very fast, we could have blockaded Japan. This would have severely hurt the economy of the nation because they didn’t have the oil or the resources the fight back. Japan would have given up if we didn’t drop the atomic bomb, but it would have taken a little bit of time. It would have just turned into a cold war between Japan and the U.S.

The pain that was spread throughout the city's and neighbouring states

Explanation:

b. after i get up in the morning,

explanation:

after is a subordinating conjunction that introduces a time clause. time clauses are dependent clauses used to indicate when something happened.

the clause "after i get up in the morning" tells when the action in the main clause (drinking a cup of coffee) happens:

"after i get up in the morning, i drink a cup of coffee." it is the most logical choice of all.

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.