PLEASE HELP As white Americans pushed west, Native Americans suffered loss of land, disease, and forced change. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 created Indian Territory, a place reserved for eastern Native American tribes. Though they lost the case of Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, the Cherokee reached independent status through the Supreme Court case of Worcester v. Georgia. However, a controversial treaty allowed removal to continue. The Trail of Tears was a painful event for the Cherokee people.
Robert Lindneux's Painting Response
Now you should be familiar with the impact of westward expansion on Native Americans. Imagine you could speak to some of the people in Robert Lindneux’s painting. Use what you learned to create responses for the interview questions shown in the image below. You may submit the responses as text-only or as an image of the painting with captions.

**FOREWARNING**

Okay, so I have not done this assignment or any type of work like this, so I am not guaranteeing that my response will be correct. But I tried my best and answer thoughtfully, so hopefully this is a good enough answer. :)

**Actual Response**

Robert Lindneux created this painting to show the struggle the Native Americans had to deal with as they were forced to leave their homelands because of Andrew Jackson's Indian Removal Act. It was meant to express the crowded migration they had to deal with, and the unsanitary, non-idealistic conditions as they headed away from their heritage and homes. If you were to look closely and carefully at the painting, you can tell that Lindneux had exaggerated and purposefully made the faces on the characters in the painting sorrowful and depressed. The conditions were exaggerated as well, notice the people having to walk and carry sacks on their backs, and people crouching over in their cloaks avoiding the sand and dust. The environment is exaggerated as well and in the landscape you can see dark, stormy clouds, meaning a bad/ dark/ depressing mood. Along with a dusty, windy ground that is surely irritating the Natives' eyes.

Hope this helps. Have a good day and good luck! :)

Your friend, Pengoon

for starters, there is the structural trend of rising primary government expenditure as a share of gdp, which reached 36% in 2014, up from 22% in 1991. this increase reflected a political desire to address the poverty and inequality that had gone unaddressed during previous decades. to support the increase, brazil’s government increased taxes on consumption and promoted progress toward labor-market formalization. nonetheless, public investment, particularly in infrastructure, took a hit. in fact, with the exception of the 2005-2008 period, total investment as a share of gdp has remained below 20% since 1991.

the answer is option a.