Using the passage below, please answer the question that follows. The Tuscarora people lived in the eastern areas of North Carolina in the 17th century. As European settlers moved into their homelands, tensions between these groups rose. European settlers moved onto native lands without apology. Soon Tuscarora women and children were being abducted and sold into slavery by the settlers. Tuscarora hunting parties were attacked and killed or sold into slavery. In 1710, prior to the outbreak of the Tuscarora War, the Tuscarora people made a plea to the governor of Pennsylvania. Desperate for peace, the Tuscarora begged for sanctuary in Pennsylvania. The speakers for the tribe talked of women and children unable to gather food and play in the forest for fear of being captured. They talked of not being able to hunt freely to support their families. They talked, above all, of a desire for peace between the settlers and themselves, even if it required leaving their homelands. However, the governor of Pennsylvania was reluctant to give them sanctuary. Among other issues, the governor feared an alliance between the Tuscarora and the Pennsylvania Iroquois. He feared increasing the Native American presence in Pennsylvania would upset the settlers already there. Ultimately, the Tuscarora had to make the best of their hard life in North Carolina. The harassment from settlers did not stop, and in 1711, war broke out between the settlers and the Tuscarora.

Which of the following represents the most likely view European settlers had of the events leading up to the Tuscarora War?

"The natives were peaceful so we should not exploit them, enslave them, and take their land."
"The natives gave us many chances to find a peaceful solution and we just would not listen."
"The natives were not legal owners of the land and we were justified in our treatment of them."
"The natives have behaved justly and fairly by sharing their land and their family resources with us."
Question 20(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
(03.05 LC)

Which was the "great compromise" that helped the Anti-federalists to finally approve the Constitution?

The Bill of Rights
The Federalist Papers
An amendment about slavery
The rewriting of the Preamble
You must check the box below prior to submitting your exam!

Check this box to indicate you are ready to submit your exam
FDK51.10

globalization can mean many things

the three main concepts are 1 bushiness

buiness is something thatch part of globalization a lot

which manly gives its name   but there are other actors

another 1 is communication

communication is another bold factor in globalization and wouldn't even exsist without communication

last and third is   goverment and poltics

poltics is a big but small factor it takes part of deciding peoples minds during polticis   and choosing people for the job but sometimes doesn't

you really can't answer this on your own?

a hypothesis is an expected answer to a question, usually based on some theory or prior research. hypothesis testing is a method of determining the viability of a hypothesis. let’s use the us presidential election as an example. there are many hypotheses (questions) about how people feel or whom they will vote for. the only way to know the 100% “truth” about the answers to these questions is to ask every single possible voter – something that is impossible, expensive, time consuming etc. instead, we take samples and use statistics to make “best guesses” about the answer to a particular hypothesis. we never know for sure if our conclusion is right at the time we accept/reject it, but these techniques, when used appropriately can get us close to the truth most of the time (which is a lot better than guessing, flipping coins or throwing darts to get answers).

the tricky part about hypothesis testing is that we have to think somewhat backwards about it – we have to test what is known as the “null hypothesis”. as an example, the hypothesis might be “obama is more popular than romney” while the null hypothesis is “there is no difference in popularity between obama and romney”. we focus on the null hypothesis because it tells us exactly what the expected value of our tests should be (obama popularity = romney popularity) and we can collect data and see if it comes out that way (see next section on “significance”). if it does, then we “accept the null hypothesis” and reject our original hypothesis. if the null hypothesis is disproven, we look at the data to see if our original hypothesis holds (obama> romney).

the answer is   false while the task of government is to provide some services they have the option to not provide certain services the only way that they wouldn't have to give any services would then make the government unjust which would then allow the citizens to upturn the government and then replace it with a new and "just" government that is viewed as better