How was the colonization of Australia and new zealand different from the rest of new imperialism

Both Australia and New Zealand were British colonies. However in the case of Australia, the colonies were established as convict settlements. New Zealand had Polynesian settlers before the Europeans came. In Australia the people were European, mostly poor Irish Catholics who didn't like the high class British.

Explanation:

Many Aboriginal people were killed, due to new diseases brought in by the British. Also, many of the resources were depleted during the process. The world was even affected, as the British took native Aborigines into wars with them. The culture of the Aborigines was completely demolished.

i believe the answer is d. it was not uncommon for people to faint or even convulse at these high-energy meetings.

- "schenck v. united states, case in which the u.s. supreme court ruled on march 3, 1919, that the freedom of speech protection afforded in the u.s. constitution's first amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented to society a “clear and present danger.” "

- speech aimed to potentially create danger could be banned.

< 3